Canadian Veterans Advocacy

Sunday, May 4, 2014

New announcement: Julian Fantino, Parm Gill And Laurie Hawn Make Unsupported Accusations About Vet

Julian Fantino, Parm Gill And Laurie Hawn Make Unsupported Accusations About Veterans, Says Veterans Advocate

http://blogs.ottawacitizen.com/2014/05/04/julian-fantino-parm-gill-and-laurie-hawn-make-unsupported-accusations-about-veterans-says-veterans-advocate/

May 4, 2014. 12:44 am • Section: Defence Watch

David T. MacLeod of Veteran Watch writes this:

The term McCarthyism is based on the political practices of the late US Senator McCarthy. His use of unsupported accusations and inappropriate use of information for political gain resulted in the discipline and even suicide of US government officials and politicians. The consequence of Senator McCarthy's practices was the dubious distinction of being one of the very few US Senators to be censured.

Unfortunately, McCarthy's tactics are alive and well … in Canada.

In March and April 2014 three temporary employees of the Canadian people (otherwise known as Members of Parliament) conducted practices that smack of McCarthyism.

On 27 March 2014 Parm Gill's inappropriate questioning of veterans in the Parliamentary Committee Meeting resulted in more than one letter fired off to the Prime Minster. Linda Magill (a veteran herself and the wife of a veteran) was present at the committee meeting and was so enraged by Gill's behaviour she fired off a terse email to the Prime Ministers office.
You can read her letter on Facebook. (https://www.facebook.com/linda.magill.79)

On 7 April the Honourable Minister Fantino abused parliamentary committee testimony for political gain by using the dirt that Parm Gill had sifted for him on 27 March. Fantino Tweeted :

"Disappointed that Union of Veterans Affairs Employees financing Veterans groups with secret "War Fund."

Fantino then had the cheek to provide a link to the testimony of veterans concerning the Mandatory Review of the New Veterans Charter.

Both Gill's insinuation and Fantino's accusation of a "war fund" are unsubstantiated. Any politician who would use testimony before a Parliamentary Committee as a source of political attack does not deserve to hold office.

On April 9, 2014 the Honourable Laurie Hawn, tabled his Private Member's Bill C-593 entitled the "Canadian Forces and Royal Canadian Mounted Police Former Members Personal Information Act".

Hawn incorrectly claims that veteran's currently do not have access to their medical files. Hawn is misleading the public. Veterans merely have to fill out one form. The Bill is a thinly veiled effort to violate serving members, veterans, and their spouses' privacy – is this an intimidation effort?

Within two weeks Fantino, Gill, and Hawn had made unsupported accusations and inappropriately used information for political gains.

I caution these temporary employees (Members of Parliament) that US Senator McCarthy's behaviour significantly disrupted US government business and caused irreparable damage to McCarthy's political career.

McCarthyism is unbecoming a Member of Parliament. Inappropriate use of Parliamentary testimony combined with unsupported accusations is unacceptable. Canadians, including veterans, deserve better service from temporary employees – especially Members of Parliament.

To unsubscribe from these announcements, login to the forum and uncheck "Receive forum announcements and important notifications by email." in your profile.

You can view the full announcement by following this link:
http://canadianveteransadvocacy.com/Board2/index.php?topic=13211.0

Regards,
The Canadian Veterans Advocacy Team.

Thursday, May 1, 2014

Former veterans ombudsman slams planned National Day of Honour

Former veterans ombudsman slams planned National Day of Honour

Strogan says creating day for Afghanistan veterans will create divisions among country's veterans

CBC News Posted: Apr 30, 2014 9:32 PM MT Last Updated: May 01, 2014 8:04 AM MT

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/former-veterans-ombudsman-slams-planned-national-day-of-honour-1.2627958

A former veterans ombudsman and colonel is slamming plans to hold a National Day of Honour for members of the military who served in Afghanistan.

The National Day of Honour May 9 will include events on Parliament Hill and at bases and legions across the country.

However, some members of the military community – including a retired colonel of the Princess Patricia's Canadian Light Infantry – are unhappy with the plans.

Pat Stogran spent two years based in Edmonton, and led the first Canadian soldiers deployed to Kandahar.

From 2007 to 2010, Stogran served as Canada's first veteran's ombudsman – a position he says he lost after speaking critically about the federal government's treatment of veterans.

Click below to listen to Stogran's full interview with CBC's John Archer. http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/former-veterans-ombudsman-slams-planned-national-day-of-honour-1.2627958


Regards,
The Canadian Veterans Advocacy Team.

http://canadianveteransadvocacy.com/Board2/index.php

Sunday, April 20, 2014

New announcement: Senator Dallaire ‘pissed off’ at Con MPs complaining veterans ‘cost too much’

Senator Romeo Dallaire 'pissed off' at Conservative MPs complaining veterans 'cost too much'

Murray Brewster, Canadian Press | April 4, 2014 11:04 AM ET
More from Canadian Press

http://news.nationalpost.com/2014/04/04/senator-romeo-dallaire-pissed-off-at-conservative-mps-complaining-veterans-cost-too-much/

There are rumblings in the corridors of power on Parliament Hill that MPs have grown impatient with the cost burden imposed by Canada's military veterans, one of the country's most prominent former soldiers said Thursday.

Sen. Romeo Dallaire, a former lieutenant-general and ex-commander of the ill-fated peacekeeping mission in Rwanda, described a number of recent encounters with "politicians who are second-guessing the cost of veterans."

Dallaire — who made the comments in an interview with The Canadian Press before testifying Thursday at the House of Commons veterans committee — did not identify the individuals in question.

But he said he's been hearing privately from politicians who complain about the price tag: the Conservative government spends roughly $3.8 billion each year on the Veterans Affairs Department.

Now that they're home — and the ones that are injured — they cost too much?

"And I say: Oh, yeah?" said Dallaire, describing how he walks them through the dollar cost of equipping and deploying the military on missions like the recently concluded 12-year mission in Afghanistan.

"And then I say, 'Now that they're home — and the ones that are injured — they cost too much?' This has been sniffing its way around the Conservative hallways and it's pissing me off."

The rumblings stand in stark contrast to the Harper government's political messaging, which has been to strenuously insist that the Conservatives bend over backwards for Canada's veterans and will continue to do so.

Dallaire's remarks drew an immediate, sharp rebuttal from Nicholas Bergamini, a spokesman for Veterans Affairs Minister Julian Fantino.

"It is not appropriate to spread rumours without any kind of attribution," Bergamini said. "The fact remains that no government in modern history has invested more money for veterans services."

Yet, the government has pointedly failed to reconcile its political talking points with the legal stand being taken by Justice Department lawyers in a prominent class-action lawsuit being brought by veterans of the Afghan war.

In a statement of defence filed with B.C. Superior Court, the government argues there is no "social contract" between the country and its soldiers, despite their commitment to lay down their lives without question, and that promises made by past governments to care for the wounded are not binding on current and future governments.

Those assurances, which date back to the First World War, are merely political statements, not policy, which can be amended, they maintain.

There needs to be a legislated social covenant with soldiers, Dallaire told the committee Thursday.

Since 2006, tens of millions of extra dollars have been poured into veterans care, but that can't be considered a measure of success, Dallaire added.

The government's position in the B.C. lawsuit represents a fundamental shift in the way former soldiers are viewed by their government, and it's no accident the Harper government has not withdrawn it, critics say.

The veterans committee has been holding hearings on the New Veterans Charter, the legislation which spells out the benefits and entitlements of ex-soldiers. The lawsuit alleges the new system is less generous than its predecessor, which provided pensions for life to injured and maimed soldiers.

The committee has already heard a chorus of complaints from veterans — and there are signs it is starting to sting.

Conservative MP Parm Gill, Fantino's parliamentary secretary, set his sights on one particularly vocal group last week, demanding that Canadian Veterans Advocacy disclose its funding sources and accusing one of its leaders of being partisan.

"Do you think to help the committee you would be able to provide for the committee a breakdown of your funding for the past two years, and any activity you have engaged in with political parties in Canada?" Gill asked.

Also last week, Conservative MP Brian Hayes took issue with comments posted on a popular website for veterans, including one that said the closest Fantino had ever been to a trench was "a trench coat."

"It disturbs me to see a negative thread, a negative opinion like that allowed to stay," Hayes told the committee.

Ron Cundell, a veteran who is one of the site's administrators, said Hayes singled out one comment out of over 300,000, and wondered if Hayes was endorsing censorship.

"That is unfair for you to take away that person's freedom of speech," he testified.

On Thursday, Dallaire told the committee he believes that National Defence and Veterans Affairs should be folded into one department, each with its own budget, in order to provide uninterrupted care to the wounded.

To unsubscribe from these announcements, login to the forum and uncheck "Receive forum announcements and important notifications by email." in your profile.

You can view the full announcement by following this link:
http://canadianveteransadvocacy.com/Board2/index.php?topic=13077.0

Regards,
The Canadian Veterans Advocacy Team.

Friday, April 18, 2014

**Access to Information and Privacy (ATIP) Online Request**

**Access to Information and Privacy (ATIP) Online Request**

Please click here to process your claim online: https://atip-aiprp.apps.gc.ca/atip/welcome.do


For VAC you should request:

PPU: 055 (Pensions and Compensation), 560 (Disability Awards, Death Benefit and Detention Benefit), 030 (Treatment of a Pensioned/Awarded Condition), 550 (Rehabilitation Services and Vocational Assistance), 010 (Educational Assistance), 056 (Veterans Independence Program), 016 (Residential Care), 520 (Health Benefits Program/Public Service Health Care Plan), 020 (Health Care Programs (Non-pension Related), 080 Reviews, Appeals and 090 Bureau of Pensions Advocates and All Services All Summary Assessment.

For DND you should request:

PPU: 834 (Personnel Security Investigation File), 818 (Personal Information File), 836 (Unit Military Personnel Bank), 831 (Grievance File), 824 (Department of National Defence and Veterans Affairs Canada Centre for the Support of Injured and Retired Members and their Families), 817 (Canadian Forces Casualty Database), 810 (Medical Records), 811 (Dental Records), 859 (Pension File), 858 (Pay Records File), 805 (Human Resources Management Information System), 829 (DSSPM - Clothing Online).

Regards,
The Canadian Veterans Advocacy Team.

http://canadianveteransadvocacy.com/Board2/index.php

Thursday, April 17, 2014

New announcement: Area Legion branches welcome to attend Rock the Hill rally June 4

Area Legion branches welcome to attend Rock the Hill rally June 4

http://www.insideottawavalley.com/news-story/4471094-area-legion-branches-welcome-to-attend-rock-the-hill-rally-june-4/

Carleton Place Almonte Canadian Gazette

Apparently Veterans Affairs Minister Julian Fantino hadn't heard the saying "don't poke the sleeping bear," when he brushed off a group of veterans who had arrived at the minister's office for a scheduled meeting on Jan. 28.

What had been a simmering pot of human emotions among veterans and advocacy groups reached a boiling point at the Fantino office debacle, and it would seem that enough fuel has been added to the fire to ensure a successful turnout of veterans for a rally which begins June 4 on Parliament Hill.

Rock the Hill 2014 is the brainchild of Rob Gallant, a former Royal Canadian Air Force member who was medically released in 2003 after serving his country for 20 years. Gallant intends to show the government "that we, as veterans, have been pushed to the point that we no longer will stay silent while they cut our programs, medical treatment, and benefits, without a fight."

He went on to say that if the expected number of people show up for the event, "it will show this government we will no longer stay the silent minority that they have always counted on. (We hope to) enlighten the Canadian public on all the misleading statements or half-truths stated by this government. In simple terms we will be filling in the blanks that the government seems to always leave out." Gallant's involvement in veterans' advocacy goes back at least to the Service Income Security Insurance Plan

(SISIP) Long Term Disability Class Action in March of 2007. The lawsuit was on behalf of Dennis Manuge and all other disabled veterans whose benefits were reduced by the amount of the monthly Veterans Affairs Canada (VAC) disability pension they were receiving under the Pension Act.

A decision by the federal court in May of 2012 ruled in favour of Manuge, and that the government must stop clawing back money from veterans' pensions, and repay up to $1 billion that had been deducted over a period of nearly 30 years. A similar case, the Equitas Class Action Lawsuit, is currently before the Supreme Court of British Columbia.

Manuge related that "Rob Gallant provided direct and continuous close support to me personally for the entire duration the legal challenge. He took the added volunteer responsibility for relaying direct SISIP class action information to a database of class members, veterans' organizations, and media members. Despite the SISIP court victory, there remains a multitude of issues facing the veterans' community and their families. The Equitas class action, suicide rates, reductions in staffing and office closures at VAC, homeless vets, systemic failure at Veterans Review and Appeal Board, the current minister's culture of disrespecting veterans, and the list goes on. This is why there is a need for Rock the Hill. Canadians need to hear from us and see us. It's an awesome initiative on Rob's part."

In an email interview, Gallant acknowledged that Canada's veterans and serving members "have definitely been let down by this government in so many ways it's hard to keep count. This current government has set veterans rights and benefits back at least a decade if not two. One only has to ask: Why do veterans, as a last resort, have to take their own government to court to get the system fixed?" Gallant referred to the two major court cases previously mentioned, the SISIP and Equitas class actions. He said that "in both of these cases the government knows what they are and were doing, is unfair and wrong, but they continue to use taxpayers' money to fight the same veterans that they proudly state in public they support. Not to mention the amount of veterans that have to endure a long and hard fight to get the benefits and treatment they are rightfully entitled to from VAC. Many are taking their own lives due to the way the system is set up against them."

The suicide issue relating to veterans and serving members of the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) was brought to the fore on Nov. 29, 2013 when CBC's Rosemary Barton interviewed retired colonel and former Veterans' Ombudsman Pat Stogran.

"It's not news; it's bad news; it's not new news; there's going to be more," Stogran said in an impassioned response to Barton's questioning. At the time, three confirmed suicides had occurred in that month of November, and in just a few days there would be another. Although those suicides had occurred among serving CAF personnel, experts agree there are also many veterans across the country that are dealing with the horrors and suffering of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), which is thought to be the strongest link to suicide and attempts. Stogran will be one of the keynote speakers at the Parliament Hill rally.

That rash of suicides forced politicians, military command, and support organizations to address that previously unmentionable subject, when the Royal Canadian Legion, Veterans Affairs Canada, and the Minister of Defence all issued news releases on Dec. 4, 2013.

The level of public outrage was apparent in the CBC interview with Stogran, who is known for his outspokenness and criticism of the government. In a voice shaking with emotion, he asked Barton the rhetorical question: "How many ways do you say tsunami?" Stogran went on to say "how terribly we treat the worst cases and the people who are the most desperate."

Although the Legion has been strongly criticized in the past for not taking a stance on political issues, their news release at the time stated: "The Legion strongly believes that all Canadians trust the government will honour its obligation to the men and women of

the CAF and the RCMP who willingly risk injury, illness or death to serve our country, protecting the values and way of life we all enjoy. There is also a responsibility to the families of these men and women. These recent tragic events highlight that there is a perception by our serving members that there is no hope. How can a culture built on camaraderie and team work leave a soldier so isolated and so alone?" The release ended by asking: "How can we possibly justify spending money to mark the commemorations for our achievements as nation when the mental health care system supporting the men and women of the CAF, both Regular and Reserve, as well as RCMP members and all their families who serve our country, is overburden and lacking resources?" Public debate on how to deal with military suicides was renewed, wrote Andre Mayer of CBC News on Mar. 24, with the recent deaths of two Canadian soldiers who fought in Afghanistan.

"But veterans advocates say that the data collected by the Canadian Armed Forces and Veterans Affairs Canada on how many active and retired army personnel have committed suicide is incomplete, and makes it difficult to help soldiers who may be suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)."

As of Mayer's news article, five military suicides had been confirmed in 2014.

Local Legions welcome to attend Legion Branch 244 in Perth plans to attend the rally as a group, and is encouraging other Legion branches in the area to join them. Perth and area Legions are no strangers to advocacy on behalf of veterans, as on Sept. 16, 2013, Medric "Cous" Cousineau and his service dog Thai were welcomed by Perth and other Legion branches during the Long Walk to Sanity, part of the Paws Fur Thought initiative, between Eastern Passage, Nova Scotia and Ottawa.

Cousineau was hailed as a hero in 1986 while serving as a tactical co-ordinator on an Armed Forces Sea King helicopter, when he and his crew responded to a call from an American fishing vessel in distress several hundred miles off the coast of Newfoundland. In spite of being injured during the mission, he managed to rescue the two men, and he was later awarded the Star of Courage by then Governor General Jeanne Sauvé. After showing symptoms of PTSD following the traumatic incident, Cousineau experienced a tragic downward spiral, and he was eventually forced to leave the military.

Paws Fur Thought was an idea born in 2012 and, while the "Long Walk to Sanity" ended on Sept. 19 at the Canadian War Museum in Ottawa, the concept of Paws Fur Thought and other initiatives to assist veterans and their families continues on, thanks to the support of many dedicated individuals and organizations.

This old proverbial message goes to our current government: "Don't poke sleeping bears if you want to live a long and happy life." Perhaps Rock the Hill 2014 will be an opportunity for bureaucrats and elected officials to reach out to the many veterans and supporters assembled there.

Submitted by Terry O'Hearn, Zone G6 public relations officer, Royal Canadian Legion.

To unsubscribe from these announcements, login to the forum and uncheck "Receive forum announcements and important notifications by email." in your profile.

You can view the full announcement by following this link:
http://canadianveteransadvocacy.com/Board2/index.php?topic=13059.0

Regards,
The Canadian Veterans Advocacy Team.

Tuesday, April 15, 2014

Crisis in the Military - The Social Contract

The Social Contract
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vwyapnWLai0


Crisis in the Military
http://globalnews.ca/invisible-wounds/1257394/invisible-wounds/

Regards,
The Canadian Veterans Advocacy Team.

http://canadianveteransadvocacy.com/Board2/index.php

New announcement: Veterans bang heads against Parliamentary, bureaucratic wall

Veterans bang heads against Parliamentary, bureaucratic wall

The government is clearly not holding up its end of the bargain on veterans.

http://www.hilltimes.com/opinion-piece/2014/04/14/veterans-bang-heads-against-parliamentary-bureaucratic-wall/38146


The Hill Times photograph by Jake Wright

Veterans pictured last year in Ottawa on Remembrance Day. Sean Bruyea says MPs have never debated or given serious independent and binding consideration of the dramatic changes that the NVC made to the relationship between Canada and those who were and are prepared to lay down their lives in her service.

By SEAN BRUYEA

Published: Monday, 04/14/2014- THE HILL TIMES


The hue and cry from veterans and their families has not dimmed but grown stronger since 2005 when Parliament passed the legislation we now know as the 'New Veterans Charter' or NVC. Will Parliament take up veterans' torch and finally make bureaucracy work for veterans? As the unaddressed recommendations accumulate, will the NVC become increasingly unfit to provide adequate shelter for our veterans and their families in the coming years?

Last week, the House Committee on Veterans Affairs wrapped up hearings on the NVC. We must remember that elected Members of the House of Commons have never debated nor given serious independent and binding consideration of the dramatic changes that the NVC made to the relationship between Canada and those who were and are prepared to lay down their lives in her service.

In good faith, far too many accepted the shoddy construction of the NVC because government promised to keep the renovations going. Near stagnant 'incrementalism,' a dirty word in the first 50 years of veterans' benefits in Canada, has become the sad new social contract between Canada and, our veterans and their families.

Veterans Affairs Canada made pretenses to the glory of Canada's post World War II veterans' benefits. The original aptly-named Veterans Charter provided a host of programs for all veterans, whether injured or not. The NVC is not a charter at all but a cynical repackaging of already existing programs with few limited additions.

It took four years before the Veterans Affairs Committee wrote its first report in 2010 with 18 recommendations. Four years later, we are at it yet again with witnesses fighting to implement many of the same recommendations such as boosting the income loss program to 100 per cent matching projected career earnings, not just a fraction of true inflation as is now the case.

Bureaucrats claim to have implemented 10 recommendations from the Parliamentary report, including " VAC ensures that family members who take care of severely disabled Veterans are compensated appropriately." VAC's basis for this claim: the Forces have a "Canadian Armed Forces Attendant Care Benefit." Perhaps being so far away in Charlottetown, VAC senior bureaucrats do not realize veterans are ineligible for CF benefits. Misleading justification is repeated in most of the 160 recommendations that VAC claims to have implemented.

Canadians go to war, fight, die, lose limbs, minds and families, all at Parliament's orders, for our values, our nation. They sacrifice for all Canadians. The military does not do all of this for bureaucrats even though bureaucrats may think differently. Then, why is it that Parliament, through either inaction or inability, has failed to stand up to the bureaucracy?

There are greater problems with the NVC than just the empty and specious rhetoric coming from Charlottetown. I tabled 30 recommendations for this Parliamentary review in a report titled, "Severely Injured Veterans and Their Families: Improving Accessibility To Veterans Affairs Programs For A Better Transition."

As both sides of the committee table observed during witness testimony, at Veterans Affairs Canada, availability of programs does not equate to accessibility. Why for instance should widows or spouses of incapacitated veterans be time-limited on any program?
In legislation which pre-dated the NVC, the Pension Act, all programs were payable effectively on date of application. The NVC income loss program is payable when "the minister determines that a rehabilitation plan or a vocational assistance plan should be developed." Application for review of any decision must be made within 60 days of VAC's decision. The Pension Act did not place time limits on review.

Such pettiness is endemic in the New Veterans Charter.

Government is quick to march out the hypothetical 24-year-old corporal from the veterans' ombudsman report who is projected to receive $2-million from VAC over his lifetime. Ignoring that $340,000 must be repaid in taxes, when none of the Pension Act benefits are taxable, this corporal represents fewer than 77 individuals, or 0.1 per cent of Canadian Forces VAC clients.

The veterans' ombudsman noted of all the recipients of the permanent incapacity allowance, only one receives the highest grade of $1,724.65 monthly. As for the highly controversial lump sum which now stands at $301,275.26, only 148, or 0.35 per cent of all lump sum recipients have been awarded this amount in eight years. Currently, only two per cent of the 42,000 lump sum recipients have any long term economic assistance.

Contrary to VAC's claims, the NVC does not offer opportunity with security. Canada Pension Plan disability, once accused of being insensitive and lacking compassion now allows disabled recipients to earn up to $5,100 annually without reporting this to CPP. The VAC extended income loss program deducts 100 per cent of earnings. Troublingly, the most seriously ill veterans are also not supported to pursue education.

VAC derogatorily and deceptively claims veterans were focused on disability not ability under the pre-NVC system. However, the Pension Act guarantees, "no deduction shall be made from the pension of any member of the forces because the member undertook work or perfected themself in some form of industry." The Pension Act offered much security for the veteran to explore opportunities. Sadly, the NVC incarcerates our most suffering veterans in a lifelong psychological and financial prison of frozen human potential.

Would it not be better to provide access to life-enriching education and opportunities to seek employment without penalty while these veterans in turn begin to pay more taxes, hence offsetting some of their disability costs? Does that not make better economic sense?

All veterans and their families especially the most seriously ill, fulfilled their obligation at government's orders without delay, without complaint, without excuse. All they rightly expected was that government honour its end of the contract immediately, expeditiously and for as long as those veterans and their families live.

For our most seriously injured veterans and their families, miserly constructed and administered programs have soundly violated this quid pro quo. Government is clearly not holding up its end of the bargain.

This dire situation wherein even the most loyal and timid of veterans organizations speak out is a very loud alarm clock for our elected officials to stand up to the bureaucracy and stand up for our veterans once and for all.

Sean Bruyea, vice-president of Canadians for Accountability, is a retired Air Force intelligence officer and frequent commentator on government, military, and veterans' issues. For Sean's report and testimony visit www.seanbruyea.com
news@hilltimes.com
The Hill Times

To unsubscribe from these announcements, login to the forum and uncheck "Receive forum announcements and important notifications by email." in your profile.

You can view the full announcement by following this link:
http://canadianveteransadvocacy.com/Board2/index.php?topic=13027.0

Regards,
The Canadian Veterans Advocacy Team.